vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legacy Housing Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.5M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.7× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs -2.0%, a 34.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs -30.6%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
LEGH vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 40.4% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 32.2% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -30.6% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.1% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.60 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.64 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.6M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $580.3M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.0K | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0K | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $528.6M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.6M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $512.8M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.3M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $580.3M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.9M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.6M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.2M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $521.4M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $514.9M | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.32× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
