vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $12.5M, roughly 1.1× Local Bounti Corporation). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -69.8%, a 56.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Local Bounti Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Local Bounti Corporation's revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Local Bounti Corporation is a U.S.-based sustainable indoor agriculture firm growing fresh, pesticide-free leafy greens, herbs and produce via advanced hydroponic and vertical farming tech. It serves North American retail and food service partners, focusing on low environmental impact and stable year-round supply.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
LOCL vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.5M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.7M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -106.1% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -69.8% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.0% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.4M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.6M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.7M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.3M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.3M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -106.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -149.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -127.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -135.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -166.6% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -176.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -146.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -122.9% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -69.8% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -216.6% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -178.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -324.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -360.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -267.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -286.9% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.32 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.24 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.89 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-166.2M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $410.5M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $937.0K | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.0K | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $483.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $484.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $480.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $329.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-166.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-158.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-132.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-134.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-100.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.8M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $410.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.8M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $447.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.8M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.1M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $413.4M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.1M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -29.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-42.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.1M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.2M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -82.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -121.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -293.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -305.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -501.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 97.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 125.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 263.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 417.3% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCL
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
