vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
La Rosa Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.2M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.4× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -27.4%, a 25.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 18.2%).
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
LRHC vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.2M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.44 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.7% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.7% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 337.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -546.5% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.2% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.44 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.25 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.86 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.54 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.49 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.49 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $645.9K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.8K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.5M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $64.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-591.6K | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-803.1K | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
