vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC (TCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
La Rosa Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.2M vs $12.1M, roughly 1.7× TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC). TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC runs the higher net margin — 68.8% vs -27.4%, a 96.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 0.7%).
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc. (TCI) is a U.S.-based real estate investment firm that owns, operates and develops a diversified portfolio of residential, commercial and mixed-use properties across core U.S. regional markets. It pursues long-term value growth via strategic property acquisitions, efficient asset management and tailored leasing solutions for individual and business tenants.
LRHC vs TCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.2M | $12.1M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $8.3M |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | -28.9% |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | 68.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.7% | 7577.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.44 | $0.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $724.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $169.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $108.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.7% | -10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.7% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.7% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.0% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 337.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -546.5% | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | 21.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.44 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.25 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.86 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.54 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.49 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.49 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0M | $89.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.8K | $210.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | $846.7M |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | 0.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $89.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $73.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $88.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $99.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $131.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $127.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $130.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $210.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.8K | $223.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.3K | $212.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $645.9K | $198.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6K | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.2K | $180.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.8K | $177.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.4K | $178.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $846.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $838.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $837.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.5M | $837.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $832.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $832.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $830.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $828.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | 0.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-591.6K | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-803.1K | $-511.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-538.3K | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | -17.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
TCI
Segment breakdown not available.