vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.4M vs $13.3M, roughly 2.0× Laird Superfood, Inc.). NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 40.9% vs -13.2%, a 54.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. (MD) is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region. It provides a comprehensive suite of consumer and commercial banking services, including deposit products, mortgage loans, small business financing, and wealth management solutions to individual and local enterprise clients.
LSF vs NECB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $26.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $10.8M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 59.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 40.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 5.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $27.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $25.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $25.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 59.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 61.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 57.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 57.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 65.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 62.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 44.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 41.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 40.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.97 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $81.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $70.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $351.7M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $64.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $59.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $89.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $97.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $113.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $107.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $351.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $344.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $336.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $327.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $318.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $309.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $300.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $288.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $52.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 192.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $89.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $48.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 192.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 189.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
NECB
Segment breakdown not available.