vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and ON Semiconductor (ON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $788.7M, roughly 1.9× Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs 11.2%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 4.7%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($217.2M vs $-61.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -9.9%).
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. operates a network of premium athletic, fitness and wellness destinations across the United States. It offers diverse services including state-of-the-art gym facilities, group exercise classes, personal training, spa treatments, nutrition coaching, youth programs and co-working spaces for consumers pursuing holistic healthy lifestyles.
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
LTH vs ON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $788.7M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $88.1M | $181.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 57.9% |
| Net Margin | 11.2% | 12.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $788.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $745.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $782.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $761.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $706.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $663.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $693.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $667.8M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $88.1M | $181.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.0M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.4M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.1M | $-486.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.2M | $379.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.4M | $401.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.8M | $338.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.1% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.5% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.8% | 45.2% |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | 57.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | -39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 22.4% |
| Q1 26 | 11.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | -33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.39 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.45 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $3.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $7.3B |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $12.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $120.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.5M | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $8.3B |
| Q1 26 | $8.1B | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.0B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $13.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.46× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.8M | $239.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-61.2M | $217.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.8% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.26× | 1.32× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-123.6M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.8M | $239.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.9M | $418.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.1M | $184.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $195.7M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.1M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $465.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $362.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-61.2M | $217.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.6M | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.6M | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.3M | $454.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.8M | $434.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $293.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $207.7M |
| Q1 26 | -7.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.26× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.45× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.39× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.65× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.23× | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LTH
| Center revenue | $767.6M | 97% |
| Other revenue | $21.1M | 3% |
ON
Segment breakdown not available.
