vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $555.6M, roughly 2.0× Mid-America Apartment Communities). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 10.4%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 1.0%). Teradyne produced more free cash flow last quarter ($218.8M vs $158.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 1.1%).

Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Memphis, Tennessee that invests in apartments in the Southeastern United States and the Southwestern United States.

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.

MAA vs TER — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TER
TER
2.0× larger
TER
$1.1B
$555.6M
MAA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TER
TER
+42.9% gap
TER
43.9%
1.0%
MAA
Higher net margin
TER
TER
13.4% more per $
TER
23.7%
10.4%
MAA
More free cash flow
TER
TER
$60.2M more FCF
TER
$218.8M
$158.6M
MAA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TER
TER
Annualised
TER
34.4%
1.1%
MAA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Revenue
$555.6M
$1.1B
Net Profit
$57.6M
$257.2M
Gross Margin
57.2%
Operating Margin
10.4%
27.1%
Net Margin
10.4%
23.7%
Revenue YoY
1.0%
43.9%
Net Profit YoY
-65.5%
75.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.48
$1.62

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$555.6M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$554.4M
$769.2M
Q2 25
$549.9M
$651.8M
Q1 25
$549.3M
$685.7M
Q4 24
$549.8M
$752.9M
Q3 24
$551.1M
$737.3M
Q2 24
$546.4M
$729.9M
Q1 24
$543.6M
$599.8M
Net Profit
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$57.6M
$257.2M
Q3 25
$99.5M
$119.6M
Q2 25
$108.1M
$78.4M
Q1 25
$181.7M
$98.9M
Q4 24
$166.6M
$146.3M
Q3 24
$115.2M
$145.6M
Q2 24
$102.0M
$186.3M
Q1 24
$143.7M
$64.2M
Gross Margin
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
57.2%
Q3 25
58.4%
Q2 25
57.2%
Q1 25
60.6%
Q4 24
59.4%
Q3 24
59.2%
Q2 24
58.3%
Q1 24
56.6%
Operating Margin
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
10.4%
27.1%
Q3 25
18.7%
18.9%
Q2 25
20.2%
13.9%
Q1 25
34.0%
17.6%
Q4 24
31.3%
20.4%
Q3 24
21.5%
20.6%
Q2 24
19.3%
28.8%
Q1 24
27.4%
13.0%
Net Margin
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
10.4%
23.7%
Q3 25
18.0%
15.5%
Q2 25
19.7%
12.0%
Q1 25
33.1%
14.4%
Q4 24
30.3%
19.4%
Q3 24
20.9%
19.8%
Q2 24
18.7%
25.5%
Q1 24
26.4%
10.7%
EPS (diluted)
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$0.48
$1.62
Q3 25
$0.84
$0.75
Q2 25
$0.92
$0.49
Q1 25
$1.54
$0.61
Q4 24
$1.43
$0.89
Q3 24
$0.98
$0.89
Q2 24
$0.86
$1.14
Q1 24
$1.22
$0.40

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.3M
$293.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.7B
$2.8B
Total Assets
$12.0B
$4.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$60.3M
$293.8M
Q3 25
$32.2M
$272.7M
Q2 25
$54.5M
$339.3M
Q1 25
$55.8M
$475.6M
Q4 24
$43.0M
$553.4M
Q3 24
$50.2M
$510.0M
Q2 24
$62.8M
$421.9M
Q1 24
$54.6M
$707.4M
Stockholders' Equity
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$5.7B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$5.8B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$5.9B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$5.9B
$2.8B
Q4 24
$5.9B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$6.0B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$6.1B
$2.6B
Total Assets
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$12.0B
$4.2B
Q3 25
$11.9B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$11.8B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$11.8B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$11.8B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$11.8B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$11.6B
$3.6B
Q1 24
$11.5B
$3.4B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$261.7M
$281.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$158.6M
$218.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
28.5%
20.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
18.6%
5.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.55×
1.09×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$717.9M
$450.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$261.7M
$281.6M
Q3 25
$266.4M
$49.0M
Q2 25
$353.4M
$182.1M
Q1 25
$196.6M
$161.6M
Q4 24
$239.1M
$282.6M
Q3 24
$309.5M
$166.3M
Q2 24
$349.4M
$216.1M
Q1 24
$200.3M
$7.3M
Free Cash Flow
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
$158.6M
$218.8M
Q3 25
$170.8M
$2.4M
Q2 25
$264.5M
$131.7M
Q1 25
$124.0M
$97.6M
Q4 24
$152.6M
$225.2M
Q3 24
$215.5M
$114.4M
Q2 24
$259.7M
$171.2M
Q1 24
$148.2M
$-36.7M
FCF Margin
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
28.5%
20.2%
Q3 25
30.8%
0.3%
Q2 25
48.1%
20.2%
Q1 25
22.6%
14.2%
Q4 24
27.8%
29.9%
Q3 24
39.1%
15.5%
Q2 24
47.5%
23.5%
Q1 24
27.3%
-6.1%
Capex Intensity
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
18.6%
5.8%
Q3 25
17.2%
6.1%
Q2 25
16.2%
7.7%
Q1 25
13.2%
9.3%
Q4 24
15.7%
7.6%
Q3 24
17.1%
7.0%
Q2 24
16.4%
6.1%
Q1 24
9.6%
7.3%
Cash Conversion
MAA
MAA
TER
TER
Q4 25
4.55×
1.09×
Q3 25
2.68×
0.41×
Q2 25
3.27×
2.32×
Q1 25
1.08×
1.63×
Q4 24
1.43×
1.93×
Q3 24
2.69×
1.14×
Q2 24
3.43×
1.16×
Q1 24
1.39×
0.11×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MAA
MAA

Same Store$515.5M93%
Non Same Store And Other$36.8M7%

TER
TER

Soc$646.5M60%
Memory$206.5M19%
Transferred At Point In Time$90.0M8%
Universal Robots$89.4M8%
IST$30.5M3%
Transferred Over Time$20.5M2%

Related Comparisons