vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.2× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -7.5%, a 65.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marygold Companies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -16.4%).
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
MGLD vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -7.5% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.0% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-576.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-356.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-529.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.7M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $27.8M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-908.0K | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-908.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-533.0K | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-770.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-893.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-658.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-562.0K | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-776.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-940.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.8% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
