vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MIND CTI LTD (MNDO) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIND CTI LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.8× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). MIND CTI LTD runs the higher net margin — 19.4% vs -697.1%, a 716.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. MIND CTI LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $-42.0M).
MIND CTI Ltd. is a global provider of billing and customer care solutions and messaging services for voice, data, video and content services. Headquartered in Yokneam, Israel; the company also has offices in the United States of America, Iaşi in Romania and in Germany.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
MNDO vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $950.0K | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | 19.4% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $950.0K | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.0M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $30.2M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.5M | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.6M | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 81.0% | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.20× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.7M | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | 81.0% | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.