vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 14.3%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snap-on posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 1.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 2.0%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
SCI vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
