vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($804.2M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.6× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 6.1%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.1% vs 25.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (25.9% CAGR vs 14.5%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
MPWR vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $804.2M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $193.2M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.1% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.1% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.92 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $804.2M | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | $193.2M | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | 55.3% | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | $3.92 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
