vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $27.6M, roughly 1.7× Maison Solutions Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -18.0%, a 16.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs -10.9%).
Maison Solutions Inc.MSSEarnings & Financial Report
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty home goods retail company that provides a diverse portfolio of stylish, affordably priced furniture, home decor items, and daily household products. Its primary market is the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China, serving mass consumers through both offline physical stores and online e-commerce channels.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
MSS vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $27.6M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-5.0M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -18.0% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.9% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1840.5% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $27.6M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-287.4K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-256.0K | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $700.9K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-549.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.7% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.9% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.6M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $75.4M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.4K | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.4K | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.7K | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $588.9K | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $75.4M | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.3M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.1M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.7M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSS
| Perishables | $14.4M | 52% |
| Nonperishables | $13.2M | 48% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
