vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Maison Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.6M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.5× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -18.0%, a 44.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Maison Solutions Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.5% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Maison Solutions Inc.MSSEarnings & Financial Report
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty home goods retail company that provides a diverse portfolio of stylish, affordably priced furniture, home decor items, and daily household products. Its primary market is the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China, serving mass consumers through both offline physical stores and online e-commerce channels.
LARK vs MSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $27.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.9% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -1840.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $16.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-287.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-256.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $700.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -14.4% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $11.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $75.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $775.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $445.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $355.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $588.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $73.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $77.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $82.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $82.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.24× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-2.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 5.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
MSS
| Perishables | $14.4M | 52% |
| Nonperishables | $13.2M | 48% |
