vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATRIX SERVICE CO (MTRX) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATRIX SERVICE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.3× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -0.4%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MATRIX SERVICE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, MATRIX SERVICE CO's revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Matrix Telecom, Inc., operating as Matrix Business Technologies, Trinsic, Powered by Matrix, Excel Telecommunications and various other niche brands is a United States telecommunications firm that provides voice and data services to consumers and small and medium businesses as well as multi-location distributed enterprise markets. The firm also provides wholesale voice services to the telecommunications, wireless and cable industries.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
MTRX vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.5M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $-894.0K | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.8% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $210.5M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.9M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.4M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.2M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.6M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.5M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.0M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-894.0K | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.6M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.8% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.20 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.53 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.0M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $137.6M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $650.2M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $199.0M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.3M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $224.6M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.5M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.8M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.6M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.6M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.7M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $137.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $650.2M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $598.2M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $600.3M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $513.8M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $470.2M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.4M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $440.0M | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.5M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.3M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.0% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $45.5M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.0M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTRX
| Storage And Terminal Solutions | $99.9M | 47% |
| Utility And Power Infrastructure | $75.4M | 36% |
| Process And Industrial Facilities | $35.3M | 17% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
