vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MURPHY OIL CORP (MUR) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MURPHY OIL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.1M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.4× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 1.9%, a 46.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -8.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Murphy Oil Corporation is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
MUR vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $613.1M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $11.9M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.4% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -76.3% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $613.1M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $721.0M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $672.7M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $669.6M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $753.2M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.0M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.8M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.4M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.1M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.7M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.0M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.6% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 100.0% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.4% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $377.2M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $377.2M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.0M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.6M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.9M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $423.6M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.2M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.6M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.4M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.25× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $249.6M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 20.92× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $249.6M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $339.4M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.1M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $300.7M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $433.6M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $429.0M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $467.7M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.8M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 20.92× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.12× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.61× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.08× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.66× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.43× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
