vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.3M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.0× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -1545.5%, a 1525.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.7% vs -20.7%). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.5M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a regional bank holding company based in the United States, operating primarily across the U.S. Northeast region. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, commercial lending, and wealth management solutions for retail consumers, small to medium-sized businesses and local community clients.
MX vs NFBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $41.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-27.4M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -1263.3% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -1545.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -343.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $36.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $31.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $31.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -1263.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -1545.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $164.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $690.1M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $97.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $101.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $238.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $666.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $690.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $719.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $710.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $711.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $704.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $699.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $698.4M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $5.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $53.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $52.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 127.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $89.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $53.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $52.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 127.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 34.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 26.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 81.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
NFBK
Segment breakdown not available.