vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.9× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs -20.7%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
MX vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
