vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Labs Ltd (NA) and TOP Financial Group Ltd (TOP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOP Financial Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.1× Nano Labs Ltd). Nano Labs Ltd runs the higher net margin — 754.5% vs 6.6%, a 747.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Weebit Nano is a public semiconductor IP company founded in Israel in 2015 and headquartered in Hod HaSharon, Israel. The company develops Resistive Random-Access Memory technologies. Resistive Random-Access Memory is a specialized form of non-volatile memory (NVM) for the semiconductor industry. The company's products are targeted at a broad range of NVM markets where persistence, performance, and endurance are all required. ReRAM technology can be integrated in electronic devices like weara...
Sun Life Financial Inc. is a Canadian financial services company headquartered in Toronto, Ontario. Founded in 1865, it operates internationally in life insurance, wealth management, and asset management. As of 2024, the company manages over CAD$1.3 trillion in assets and serves clients in Canada, the United States, Asia, and other markets.
NA vs TOP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | $20.3M | $190.5K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 754.5% | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $190.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-985.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -459.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -237.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 754.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -85.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -231.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $14.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $24.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $106.5M | $35.0M |
| Total Assets | $159.3M | $64.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $106.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -312.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -312.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -620.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -443.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 133.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
