vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) and LQR House Inc. (YHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nakamoto Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.9K vs $299.7K, roughly 1.5× LQR House Inc.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -1368.7%, a 9742.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nakamoto Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-26.3% vs -64.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LQR House Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-21.1% CAGR vs -26.7%).
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
NAKA vs YHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $444.9K | $299.7K |
| Net Profit | $37.3M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -41198.2% | -1000.3% |
| Net Margin | 8374.2% | -1368.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.3% | -64.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3820.2% | 72.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $2.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $444.9K | $299.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.2K | $337.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $408.5K | $498.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.7K | $429.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $603.9K | $838.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.9K | $624.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $639.1K | $557.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $829.0K | $481.1K |
| Q4 25 | $37.3M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.0M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-282.3K | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | -41198.2% | -1000.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2680.4% | -1134.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.4% | -442.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.7% | -559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.3% | -1221.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.0% | -561.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -162.3% | -407.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.6% | -513.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8374.2% | -1368.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22162.2% | -4989.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -590.9% | -441.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.1% | -556.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -165.8% | -1760.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.5% | -538.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -206.5% | -396.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | -504.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $2.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-88.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-21.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $-15.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-18.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $514.3M | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $730.6M | $31.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.4K | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $514.3M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.6M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-383.1K | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $730.6M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $799.3K | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.5M | $-14.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.5M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.2M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-865.1K | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-913.5K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-213.4K | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-224.6K | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -511.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -161.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | -287.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.