vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) and OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OSR Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($627.7K vs $444.9K, roughly 1.4× Nakamoto Inc.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -508.9%, a 8883.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OSR Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-23.7% vs -26.3%).
NAKA vs OSRH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $444.9K | $627.7K |
| Net Profit | $37.3M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -41198.2% | -605.9% |
| Net Margin | 8374.2% | -508.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.3% | -23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3820.2% | -1283.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $444.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.2K | $627.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $408.5K | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.7K | $761.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $603.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.9K | $823.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $639.1K | $881.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $829.0K | $910.2K |
| Q4 25 | $37.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-231.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-97.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-282.3K | $-60.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | -41198.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2680.4% | -605.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.4% | -460.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.7% | -383.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.0% | -433.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -162.3% | -364.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.6% | -362.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8374.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22162.2% | -508.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -590.9% | -460.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.1% | -1496.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -165.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.5% | -28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -206.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.6M | $2.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $514.3M | $134.2M |
| Total Assets | $730.6M | $177.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $12.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $119.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.4K | $3.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $514.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.6M | $134.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $139.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $132.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-383.1K | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $730.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.4M | $177.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $185.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $799.3K | $37.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.5M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-482.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-865.1K | $-64.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-686.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-913.5K | $-483.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-213.4K | $-498.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-224.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -511.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -161.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
