vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and REGIS CORP (RGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
REGIS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.1M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.4× Namib Minerals). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $891.0K).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
REGIS CORPRGSEarnings & Financial Report
Regis Corporation is an American operator of hair salons. As of August 2021, it has 5,563 franchised and 276 company-owned salons. Its headquarters are in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
NAMM vs RGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $57.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $456.0K |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 22.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -94.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $456.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $250.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-853.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 192.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 184.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $43.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $113.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $188.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $588.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $99.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $179.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $185.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $68.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $592.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $511.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $530.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $508.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $543.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | $891.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-277.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $891.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-326.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NAMM
Segment breakdown not available.
RGS
| Franchise Segment | $37.9M | 66% |
| Royalty | $13.6M | 24% |
| Other | $2.8M | 5% |
| Fees | $1.8M | 3% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.0M | 2% |
