vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Bristow Group Inc. (VTOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Natera, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($665.5M vs $377.3M, roughly 1.8× Bristow Group Inc.). Natera, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 4.9%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs 6.7%). Bristow Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($47.8M vs $37.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
Bristow Helicopters Limited is a British civil helicopter operator originally based at Aberdeen Airport, Scotland, which is currently a part of the U.S.-based Bristow Group which in turn has its corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S. In 2020, Bristow Group was merged with Era Helicopters, a large U.S.-based commercial helicopter operator that was previously a division of Era Aviation, with the two companies then continuing to use the Bristow name.
NTRA vs VTOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $665.5M | $377.3M |
| Net Profit | $47.3M | $18.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 39.8% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 187.9% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $665.5M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $592.2M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.6M | $376.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $501.8M | $350.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $476.1M | $353.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $439.8M | $365.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $413.4M | $359.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $367.7M | $337.1M |
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-87.5M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-100.9M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.9M | $27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-53.8M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.6M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.5M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-67.6M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | -3.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.2% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.4% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.64 | $1.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.74 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.50 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.41 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.56 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $286.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $671.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $286.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $191.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.7M | $247.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.3M | $178.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.1M | $140.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $671.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $705.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $701.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $689.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $629.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $594.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $544.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $984.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $931.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $891.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.5M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.5M | $849.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.1M | $820.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.9M | $76.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.8M | $47.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.7% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $109.1M | $56.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $76.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.6M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.5M | $-603.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.0M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $37.8M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.8M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.7M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $-37.9M |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
VTOL
| Offshore Energy Services | $247.5M | 66% |
| Government Services | $100.1M | 27% |
| Other | $21.9M | 6% |
| Related Party | $7.8M | 2% |