vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $836.0M, roughly 1.9× Sinclair, Inc.). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 13.0%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ON Semiconductor posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.0% vs -16.7%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($372.4M vs $79.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Sinclair, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
Sinclair, Inc., doing business as Sinclair Broadcast Group, is a publicly traded American telecommunications conglomerate that is controlled by the descendants of company founder Julian Sinclair Smith. Headquartered in the Baltimore suburb of Cockeysville, Maryland, the company is the second-largest television station operator in the United States by number of stations after Nexstar Media Group, owning or operating 193 stations across the country in over 100 markets, covering 40% of American ...
ON vs SBGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $836.0M |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $109.0M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 9.6% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 13.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | -16.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | -38.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $836.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $773.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $784.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $776.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $917.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $829.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $798.0M |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $-64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-156.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $176.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | $23.0M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $2.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $1.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $866.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $4.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $443.0M |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 9.84× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $866.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $526.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $616.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $631.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $697.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $536.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $378.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $655.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $443.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $361.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $436.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $583.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $415.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $340.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $333.0M |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 9.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | 11.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 11.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 7.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 9.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 12.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 12.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $98.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | $79.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | 0.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | $115.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $98.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $-36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $-306.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | $79.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | $175.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | $193.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $-329.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | $-25.0M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | -39.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | -18.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | -0.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
SBGI
| Distribution Revenue | $384.0M | 46% |
| Core Advertising Revenue | $312.0M | 37% |
| Tennis Segment | $62.0M | 7% |
| Other | $40.0M | 5% |
| Other Media Non Media Revenuesand Intercompany Revenues | $24.0M | 3% |
| Political Advertising Revenue | $14.0M | 2% |
