vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC (ORRF) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($64.6M vs $62.2M, roughly 1.0× Ouster, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 39.3%).
Orrstown Financial Services Inc is a US regional bank holding company headquartered in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking solutions including deposit accounts, personal and business loans, mortgages, and wealth management services, primarily serving customers across central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
ORRF vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $64.6M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $21.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 33.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $64.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.9M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $27.0M |
| Q1 26 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.4M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.9M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $-23.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.6% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.4% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | -93.6% |
| Q1 26 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.2% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | -88.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.13 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.93 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $161.8M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $603.2M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $161.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.2M |
| Q1 26 | $603.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $591.5M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.9M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.4M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $532.9M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.7M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.2M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $278.4M | $170.6M |
| Q1 26 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $309.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.7M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $-21.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.5M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.3M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $-22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 108.6% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.7% | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.9% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.0% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -81.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ORRF
| Net Interest Income | $49.0M | 76% |
| Noninterest Income | $15.6M | 24% |
OUST
Segment breakdown not available.
