vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR) and PCB BANCORP (PCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PCB BANCORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.2M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.1× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, PCB BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -28.5%). PCB BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.4M vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PCB BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -29.7%).
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
OSUR vs PCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $29.2M |
| Net Profit | $-19.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -75.1% | 45.0% |
| Net Margin | -72.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -28.5% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -78.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.9M | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.3M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.1M | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-19.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-615.0K | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -75.1% | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.4% | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.7% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.3% | 40.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.2% | 39.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.1% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | -72.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.6% | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.6% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.3% | 30.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | 19.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.3M | $207.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $340.8M | $390.0M |
| Total Assets | $403.2M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $199.3M | $207.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.5M | $369.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.6M | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | $214.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.8M | $198.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.6M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.4M | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.8M | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | $340.8M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $384.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.7M | $376.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.3M | $370.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.3M | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.6M | $362.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.8M | $353.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.3M | $350.0M |
| Q4 25 | $403.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $457.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $479.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $464.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $467.6M | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.0M | $26.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.9M | $24.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.1% | 83.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-53.2M | $46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.0M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.1M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0K | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $8.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.9M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-347.0K | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | -37.1% | 83.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.6% | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -38.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.9% | 133.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.4% | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 25.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
PCB
Segment breakdown not available.