vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and PCB BANCORP (PCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.6M vs $29.2M, roughly 1.7× PCB BANCORP). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (48.9% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.2% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
OUST vs PCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.6M | $29.2M |
| Net Profit | $4.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 45.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 48.9% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $48.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $24.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.6M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.9M | $6.3M |
| Q1 26 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -61.4% | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -76.5% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.0% | 40.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.1% | 39.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -98.0% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -93.6% | 36.3% |
| Q1 26 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -55.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.8% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.5% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -91.1% | 30.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.4% | 25.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.54 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $173.1M | $207.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $275.6M | $390.0M |
| Total Assets | $381.5M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $173.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $208.6M | $207.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.5M | $369.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.5M | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.2M | $214.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | $198.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.2M | $177.6M |
| Q1 26 | $275.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.4M | $384.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $376.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.9M | $370.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.9M | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.7M | $362.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.6M | $353.5M |
| Q1 26 | $381.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.8M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.9M | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $26.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 83.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $14.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.0M | $12.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -59.8% | 83.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.7% | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.3% | 133.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.4% | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.5% | 53.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 7.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OUST
| Product revenue | $48.2M | 99% |
| Royalties | $347.0K | 1% |
PCB
Segment breakdown not available.
