vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $212.2M, roughly 1.4× LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.). LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.8% vs -20.7%, a 39.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs -0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., is an American SaaS company that offers a data connectivity platform whose services include data onboarding, the transfer of offline data online for marketing purposes.
OXM vs RAMP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $212.2M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 18.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | 255.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $212.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $194.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.4M | $171.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.1M | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 70.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.9% | 72.2% |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.72 | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $403.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $962.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $384.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $348.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $342.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $368.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $962.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | $943.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $947.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $948.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | $957.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $951.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.9M | $949.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | -2.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 32.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
RAMP
Segment breakdown not available.
