vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $304.6M, roughly 1.0× Trip.com Group Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs -20.7%, a 48.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
OXM vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $304.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $242.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $326.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 81.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 62.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.72 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.68 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $18.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $627.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $34.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $16.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-6.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 7.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
