vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACS Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $704.9M, roughly 1.9× SM Energy Co). On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 12.2%).
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
PACS vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $59.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3022.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $981.4M | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $934.3M | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.9M | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.1M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.38 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $197.0M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $353.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $946.8M | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $294.2M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.5M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.4M | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.2M | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | $353.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $946.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.3M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $806.8M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $750.2M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $709.6M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $572.1M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.06× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.8M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.2M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.6M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8M | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.8M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | -0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.91× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.28× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.39× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
