vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PCB BANCORP (PCB) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $29.2M, roughly 1.4× PCB BANCORP). On growth, PCB BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 1.1%). PCB BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.4M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs 10.4%).
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
PCB vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.2M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 45.0% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.65 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $29.2M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.4M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 45.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.3% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.2% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.8% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.9% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.6% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.65 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $207.1M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $390.0M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $207.1M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.8M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.1M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.6M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.8M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.5M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.5M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.9M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.8M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.3M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $353.5M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $350.0M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.6M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.4M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 83.6% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.5% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $46.0M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.6M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 133.2% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.1% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.33× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.76× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCB
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
