vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO) and Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (SPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Spero Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.6M vs $9.1M, roughly 1.4× PURE CYCLE CORP). Spero Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 250.7% vs 50.0%, a 200.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24080.8% vs 58.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Spero Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (847.7% CAGR vs 69.0%).
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
PCYO vs SPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.1M | $12.6M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | $31.5M |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 50.0% | 250.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.8% | 24080.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.0% | 250.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $12.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $52.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $65.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $114.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $140.0K |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $31.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.0K | $-13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.0K | $-12.7M |
| Q4 25 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.2% | -122758.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.0% | -28604.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | -16720.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | -9987.1% |
| Q4 25 | 50.0% | 250.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | -115550.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | -26380.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | -15668.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -9049.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.1M | $40.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $147.5M | $59.0M |
| Total Assets | $168.1M | $68.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $40.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.0M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $76.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $82.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.4M | $33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.7M | $65.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.2M | $80.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.4M | $96.2M |
| Q4 25 | $168.1M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.7M | $77.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.4M | $135.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.4M | $149.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.2M | $167.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-979.0K | $-8.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | -0.26× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-979.0K | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-503.0K | $-17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | $-23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $892.0K | $-18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-457.0K | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | -0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
SPRO
Segment breakdown not available.
