vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and STONERIDGE INC (SRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STONERIDGE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.2M vs $142.9M, roughly 1.4× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Stoneridge Inc is a global designer and manufacturer of advanced electrical and electronic components, integrated systems, and sensor solutions. It serves automotive, commercial vehicle, off-highway, and aerospace sectors, delivering products that boost vehicle safety, efficiency, connectivity, and environmental performance across key global markets.
PDM vs SRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.9M | $205.2M |
| Net Profit | $-43.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | -30.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | -6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $-2.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $205.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $237.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.5M | $239.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.2% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $-2.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $731.0K | $66.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $180.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $179.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $551.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.49× | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $48.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $201.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $179.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $260.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $253.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $271.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $270.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $277.3M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $632.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $639.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $657.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $621.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $662.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $666.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $675.4M |
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $140.6M | $8.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
SRI
| Control Devices | $51.7M | 25% |
| Electronics | $38.0M | 19% |
| EE | $34.2M | 17% |
| SE | $28.6M | 14% |
| NL | $24.5M | 12% |
| Stoneridge Brazil | $14.1M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific | $13.1M | 6% |
