vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T1 Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $120.3M, roughly 1.7× Phreesia, Inc.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -62.0%, a 65.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $12.2M).
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
PHR vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.3M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $4.3M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.7% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.3M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $654.0K | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.3% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.4M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $320.3M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $423.5M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.3M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $320.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.0M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.2M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $423.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.5M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.2M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.1% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
