vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $210.4M, roughly 1.5× PHOTRONICS INC). TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 10.9%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs -5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
PLAB vs TCBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.4M | $324.0M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $73.8M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.4% | 56.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $324.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.4M | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $307.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.1M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $229.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.0M | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.9M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.4M | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | -63.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $2.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $1.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.54 | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0K | $878.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $575.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $620.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0K | $620.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0K | $620.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0K | $660.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0K | $660.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0K | $660.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $660.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $32.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $30.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $29.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $360.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | $368.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $480.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | $332.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $347.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.1M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $317.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 106.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 180.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 253.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.19× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.55× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 6.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
TCBI
Segment breakdown not available.
