vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.8× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 7.0%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 13.7%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 14.2%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
PLOW vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.3% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.5M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.3M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.1M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.4M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.9M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.7M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.09 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.36 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $144.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $281.4M | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $626.7M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | $144.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $281.4M | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.3M | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $626.7M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.9M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $671.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.6M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.1M | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.9M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.8M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 50.3% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.47× | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.6M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.9M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.2M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.6M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.8M | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0K | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.4M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.47× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.44× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.03× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.41× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.44× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
