vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.6× PLEXUS CORP). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 4.3%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs 18.7%). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
PLXS vs SGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $49.8M | $140.8M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.5% | 95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.82 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q2 26 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $140.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-33.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $130.0M |
| Q2 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.4% |
| Q2 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% |
| Q2 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q2 26 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $303.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $303.1M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q2 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $564.5M |
| Q2 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.95× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $99.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $633.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $408.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $256.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $240.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
