vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Primerica, Inc. (PRI) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $853.7M, roughly 1.3× Primerica, Inc.). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 23.1%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 11.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Primerica, Inc. is a multi-level marketing company that provides insurance, investment and financial services to middle-income families in the United States and Canada.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
PRI vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $853.7M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $197.0M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.9% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | 23.1% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 17.9% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.11 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $853.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $839.9M | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $793.3M | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $804.8M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.8M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $774.1M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $803.4M | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $742.8M | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.8M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $178.3M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.1M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.1M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.4M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.9M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 98.0% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 98.2% | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.1% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $6.11 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.35 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.40 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.05 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.92 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.83 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.93 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $756.2M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $15.0B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $756.2M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.9M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $621.2M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $625.1M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $687.8M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.1M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $627.3M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $593.4M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $15.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $3.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $338.2M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $338.2M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $162.6M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.5M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.6M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.3M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.3M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.9M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.17× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.62× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 147.98× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.53× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRI
| Revenues From Sources Other Than Contracts With Customers | $445.9M | 52% |
| Investment And Savings Products Segment Revenues | $340.3M | 40% |
| Other | $56.5M | 7% |
| Segment Revenues From Contracts With Customers | $11.0M | 1% |
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |