vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $105.5M, roughly 1.6× Rimini Street, Inc.). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 1.3%, a 24.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs 1.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs 1.1%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
Rimini Street, Inc. is a global provider of independent third-party support services for enterprise software products including Oracle and SAP platforms. It serves clients across multiple industries worldwide, delivering cost-effective support, maintenance, and consulting solutions that help businesses cut operational expenses while ensuring software performance and security.
PRK vs RMNI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $105.5M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | 1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -59.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $105.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $109.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $103.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $104.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $114.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $103.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $724.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $-43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | 39.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -47.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | -0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | -41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | -1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $132.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $56.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $397.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $108.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $101.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | $122.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $134.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $56.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $-27.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $-27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $-63.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $-69.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $-76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $-36.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $397.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $423.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $352.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $397.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $343.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $369.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $343.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $367.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $33.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $6.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $23.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $-19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $5.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | -18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | 27.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 8.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | -0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 10.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | -5.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
