vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.2× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 2.2%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -3.3%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
PRK vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
