vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.4× Sprout Social, Inc.). On growth, Sprout Social, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 4.9%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
PRK vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $99.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $152.8M | $96.8M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $-13.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 76.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.8% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.0% | -14.0% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.17 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.1M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $152.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $393.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9B | $389.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.0M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.9M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.8% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.99× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
