vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $168.3M, roughly 2.0× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 7.1%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -2.3%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
PRK vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
