vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $219.2M, roughly 1.5× Perella Weinberg Partners). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 6.3%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs -2.3%).
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
PWP vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.2M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.8M | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $219.2M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.6M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.3M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.8M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.7M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.2M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.0M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.8M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-66.0M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.2% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.24 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.21 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $255.9M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-127.4M | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $797.6M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.9M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.5M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $407.4M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $335.1M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.3M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-127.4M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-302.4M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.4M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-323.1M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-421.4M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-360.8M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-283.0M | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $797.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $650.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $606.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $570.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $810.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.5M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.52× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-34.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.8M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.1M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-176.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.4M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.3M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.0M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $207.0M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.3M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.7M | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -83.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.85× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.50× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.18× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.23× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PWP
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
