vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $188.3M, roughly 1.1× BRC Group Holdings, Inc.). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 47.9% vs 2.2%, a 45.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -21.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ROGERS CORP's revenue compounded faster (-3.3% CAGR vs -15.4%).
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
RILY vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $188.3M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $90.3M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 79.5% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 32.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 47.9% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.9% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1710.8% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.78 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $188.3M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.3M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.2M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.2M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.0M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.5M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.5M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.6M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-433.6M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 79.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.7% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.8% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.1% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.5% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.2% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -90.8% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.1% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -126.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -169.4% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.78 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.91 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.50 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.39 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.39 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.35 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $226.6M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-171.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $226.6M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.2M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.4M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.3M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.9M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.2M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.9M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-171.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-260.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-351.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-496.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-488.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-497.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-218.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.2M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.29× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.6M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.6M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $184.0K | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.5M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.29× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.66× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RILY
| Transferred At Point In Time | $101.4M | 54% |
| Wealth Management Segment | $30.7M | 16% |
| Corporate Finance Consulting And Investment Banking Fees | $27.1M | 14% |
| Services And Fees | $24.8M | 13% |
| Commissions Fees And Reimbursed Expenses | $4.8M | 3% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
