vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) and Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRC Group Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($188.3M vs $158.6M, roughly 1.2× Stoke Therapeutics, Inc.). Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 71.2% vs 47.9%, a 23.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3661.1% vs -21.9%).
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing innovative RNA-targeted therapies for severe rare genetic diseases. Its lead candidates address unmet needs for Dravet syndrome, a rare epilepsy, and other neurological monogenic disorders, serving patients across North America and global markets.
RILY vs STOK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $188.3M | $158.6M |
| Net Profit | $90.3M | $112.9M |
| Gross Margin | 79.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 32.3% | 70.2% |
| Net Margin | 47.9% | 71.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.9% | 3661.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1710.8% | 528.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.78 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $188.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.2M | $158.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $90.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.0M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.6M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-433.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-49.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 79.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 85.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.2% | 70.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.2% | -60.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -90.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 47.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -126.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -169.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.78 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.91 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.39 | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.39 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.71 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $226.6M | $274.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-171.5M | $350.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $406.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.3M | $274.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.9M | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $190.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-171.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-260.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-351.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-496.8M | $350.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-488.2M | $229.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-497.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-218.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $406.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $271.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.2M | $131.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $131.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 83.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.29× | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $184.0K | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -102.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RILY
| Transferred At Point In Time | $101.4M | 54% |
| Wealth Management Segment | $30.7M | 16% |
| Corporate Finance Consulting And Investment Banking Fees | $27.1M | 14% |
| Services And Fees | $24.8M | 13% |
| Commissions Fees And Reimbursed Expenses | $4.8M | 3% |
STOK
Segment breakdown not available.
