vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -35.0%, a 49.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -0.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 3.1%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
SCI vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
