vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and WillScot Holdings Corp (WSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $566.0M, roughly 2.0× WillScot Holdings Corp). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -33.1%, a 47.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -6.1%). WillScot Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($149.7M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
WillScot Holdings Corp is a leading provider of modular space solutions and portable storage services across North America. It serves a wide range of sectors including construction, commercial development, education, healthcare, government projects, and special events, offering flexible, scalable temporary and semi-permanent space solutions tailored to diverse client needs.
SCI vs WSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $566.0M |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $-187.3M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | -32.5% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | -33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | -6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | -310.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $-1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $566.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $589.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $559.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $602.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $601.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $604.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $587.2M |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $-187.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $-70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 54.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 54.0% |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | -32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $-1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $14.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $856.3M |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | 4.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $856.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | 4.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | 3.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 3.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | 2.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $158.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $149.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $737.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $206.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $175.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $208.7M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $186.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $202.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $169.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $202.1M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 4.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 4.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 4.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | 3.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
WSC
| Modular Space Leasing | $249.8M | 44% |
| Value Added Product And Services | $101.0M | 18% |
| Portable Storage Leasing | $83.0M | 15% |
| Delivery Revenue | $48.2M | 9% |
| Installation Revenue | $45.0M | 8% |
| Rental Units | $19.7M | 3% |
| New Units | $15.5M | 3% |
| Value Added Services | $10.3M | 2% |
| Other Leasing Related Products And Services | $3.8M | 1% |
