vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $828.2M, roughly 1.3× Rithm Capital Corp.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 13.2%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rithm Capital Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (508.5% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -17.9%).
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
RITM vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $828.2M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $109.5M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.9% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 508.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.7% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $828.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $768.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $619.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $109.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.5M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.7M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.7M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.6M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $53.4B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $35.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.1B | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $53.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.1B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.0B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.79× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.92× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.18× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.87× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.10× | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-114.6M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0B | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-557.1M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8B | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $768.1M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-55.7M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.35× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.22× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.79× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.03× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.04× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.31× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RITM
| Servicing revenue, net | $375.1M | 45% |
| Other | $234.9M | 28% |
| Gain on originated residential mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net | $195.0M | 24% |
| Other revenue | $23.3M | 3% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |