vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $260.4M, roughly 2.0× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs 1.4%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs -9.4%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 14.5%).
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
SDHC vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $260.4M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.5M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.3% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $260.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $223.9M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.7M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.9M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $86.7M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $557.6M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.2M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.0M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.9M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.6M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.1M | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $557.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $570.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $429.3M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.4% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.9M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.9M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.9M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0K | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.1M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.9M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.0% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.70× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.24× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.01× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.28× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
