vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (SEDG) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Utz Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($341.0M vs $335.4M, roughly 1.0× SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Utz Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -39.4%, a 40.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.9% vs -3.1%). SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($43.3M vs $16.5M). Over the past eight quarters, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs -1.5%).
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is an Israeli company that developed a DC optimized inverter system.
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
SEDG vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.4M | $341.0M |
| Net Profit | $-132.1M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | -14.4% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | -39.4% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 70.9% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 54.0% | 108.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.21 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $335.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.2M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.4M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.4M | $346.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-132.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-50.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-124.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-98.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-287.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-130.8M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-157.3M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -309.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.8% | 25.5% |
| Q4 25 | -14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -134.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -471.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -60.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -85.0% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | -39.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -146.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -522.8% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -49.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -77.0% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.84 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.00 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.58 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.31 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.75 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $493.2M | $56.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $768.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $427.5M | $696.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $493.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $498.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $758.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $651.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.9M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $678.8M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $689.8M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $680.6M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $797.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $756.9M |
| Q4 25 | $427.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $594.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $658.3M | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $930.9M | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $671.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $52.6M | $54.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $43.3M | $16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.9% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $80.8M | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.8M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-89.3M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-44.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-217.0M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.5M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.7M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-67.0M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-243.4M | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -119.1% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.9% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SEDG
| Other | $197.7M | 59% |
| Europe Except Netherlands | $99.4M | 30% |
| Others | $38.2M | 11% |
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
