vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SEALED AIR CORP (SEE) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SEALED AIR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.1× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 3.1%, a 28.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Sealed Air Corporation is a global provider of innovative packaging and protective solutions. Its core offerings include cushioning materials, food safety and preservation packaging, and sustainable waste-reducing packaging systems, serving retail, e-commerce, food and beverage, and industrial manufacturing markets worldwide.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
SEE vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $43.8M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 3.1% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 700.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.1M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.1M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.5M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.3M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.7M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.3M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.8% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.7% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.0% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.1% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.73 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.63 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $344.0M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $7.0B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.65× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.5M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.4M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.2M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.8M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $386.0M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.6M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $953.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $797.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.5M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.1M | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.81× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $293.6M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $257.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.70× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $458.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.6M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.9M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.6M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.9M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $244.2M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.5M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.2M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.7M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.2M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $185.1M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.5M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.70× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.28× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SEE
| Protective Segment | $1.1B | 78% |
| Other | $292.0M | 21% |
| Pension Plans Defined Benefit | $7.9M | 1% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.